Validity of Bates-Jensen Modification Wound Assessment Format

  • Sariasih Dati Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Mustiah Yulistiani Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Keywords: assessment format, TIME modified Bates-Jensen, wound

Abstract

Wounds were the injured of tissue in the skin due to contact with sources of heat (such as chemicals, hot water, fire, radiation, and electricity), the results of medical measures, as well as changes in physiological conditions. Wounds could get worse if the wound was not treated properly. In determining the appropriate wound care, it was required an objective assessment of the wound that was able to assess the wound more specifically. This study aimed to determine the validity of modified TIME of Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool to nurses in assessing wounds. The type of research used was descriptive correlation using the cross sectional method. The populations in this study were nurses in the inpatient operating room and surgical poly in RSUD DR. R. Goeteng Taroenadibrata Purbalingga. Total sampling was used as the sampling technique with a total sample of 47responden. Pearson Product Moment statistical test was used to analyze the data. Data collection tools used were questionnaires consisting of three types, namely the TIME-BWAT Wound Assessment format, the BWAT wound assessment format, and the PUSH wound assessment format. The results showed that the format of TIME-BWAT had a relationship with BWAT format, r = 0.858, p < 0.001. While the format of TIME-BWAT also had a relationship with PUSH format, r = 0.826, p < 0.001. The format of TIME-BWAT is a valid assessment format because it has a relationship with the format of BWAT and PUSH.

References

Ahmad Fauzi, M. F., Khansa, I., Catignani, K., Gordillo, G., Sen, C. K., & Gurcan, M. N. (2015). Computerized segmentation and measurement of chronic wound images. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.02.015
Arisandi, D., Yotsu, R. R., Masaru Matsumoto, Ogai, K., Nakagami, G., Tamaki, T., … Junko Sugama. (2016). Evaluation of Validity of The New Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment Scale in Indonesia. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 24(5), 876–884.
Arisanty, P, I., (2013). Konsep Dasar Manajemen Perawatan Luka. Jakarta: EGC
Asbaningsih, F, Gayatri, D. (2014). Uji Kesesuaian Instrumen Skala Wagner dan Bates – Jensen Wound Assessment Tool dalam Evaluasi Derajat Kesembuhan Luka Ulkus Diabetikum. Depok : Universitas Indonesia.
Ariawan, I Gede. (2011). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja. Skripsi. Universitas Lampung.
Fiatmi, Siska Mery, Yulistiani, M. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan TIME Modifikasi BATES-JENSEN terhadap Pengetahuan Perawat dalam Mengkaji Luka Ulkus Diabetik di Ruang Rawat Inap. Purwokerto : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.
Fife, C. E., Carter, M. J., Walker, D., & Thomson, B. (2012). Wound care outcomes and associated cost among patients treated in US outpatient wound centers: Data from the US wound registry. Wounds.
Gardner, S. E., Frantz, R. A., Bergquist, S., & Shin, C. D. (2005). A prospective study of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH). Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.1.93
Gifari S, M., Tahir, T., Jafar, N., & Yusuf, S. (2018). Gambaran Karakteristik Luka Dan Perawatannya Di Klinik Perawatan Luka Griya Afiat Makassar. Skripsi.
Han, S. K. (2015). Innovations and advances in wound healing - Interactive Wound Dressings. In Innovations and Advances in Wound Healing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46587-5
Handi, P., Sriwidodo, & Ratnawulan, S. (2017). Review Sistematik : Proses Penyembuhan Dan Perawatan Luka. Farmaka Journal. https://doi.org/10.24198/JF.V15I2.13366
Harris, C., Bates-Jensen, B., Parslow, N., Raizman, R., Singh, M., & Ketchen, R. (2010). Bates-jensen wound assessment tool: Pictorial guide validation project. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e3181d73aab
Karahan, A., Toruner, E. K., Ceylan, A., Abbasoglu, A., Tekindal, A., & Buyukgonenc, L. (2014). Reliability and Validity of a Turkish Language Version of the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing, 41(4), 340–344.doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000036
Kemenkes. (2013). Riset Kesehatan Dasar. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesehatan.
Khoerunisa, Maulida, Yulistiani, M. (2019). Validitas Format Pengkajian Luka “TIME”Modifikasi BATES-JENSEN Metode Cheklist pada Perawat di Puskesmas 1 Sokaraja, Puskesmas 1 Cilongok dan Puskesmas 1 Wangon. Purwokerto : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Maryunani, Anik. Perawatan Luka (Modern Woundcare) Terlengkap dan Terkini. Bogor : In Media. 2015
Mukherjee, R., Manohar, D. D., Das, D. K., Achar, A., Mitra, A., & Chakraborty, C. (2014). Automated tissue classification framework for reproducible chronic wound assessment. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/851582
Noor, S., Zubair, M., & Ahmad, J. (2015). Diabetic foot ulcer - A review on pathophysiology, classification and microbial etiology. In Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2015.04.007
Nursalam. (2011). Konsep dan Penerapan Metodelogi Penelitian Ilmu Keperawatan. Edisi II. Jakarta : Salemba Medika.
Ousey, K., & Cook, L. (2012). Wound Assessment: Made Easy. Wounds UK.
Potter & Perry. (2011). Buku Ajar Fundamental Keperawatan Konsep, Proses, dan Praktik. Jakarta : EGC
Potter & Perry. (2009). Buku Ajar Fundamental Keperawatan Konsep, Proses, dan Praktik. Jakarta : EGC
Rasyid, N., Yusuf, S., & Tahir, T. (2018). Study Literatur : Pengkajian Luka Kaki Diabetes. Jurnal Luka Indonesia.
Rinawati, R., Agustina, R., & Suhartono, E. Penyembuhan Luka Dengan Penurunan Eritema Pada Tikus Putih (Rattus Norvegicus) Yang Diberikan Getah Batang Jarak Cina (Jatropha Multifida L.). Dunia Keperawatan, 3(1), 1-11. 2015
Roberts, P., & Newton, V. (2011). Assessment and management of diabetic foot ulcers. British Journal of Community Nursing. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.10.485
Wijaya, N. I. M. S., & Kep, M. (2018). Perawatan Luka Dengan Pendekatan Multidisiplin. Penerbit Andi.
Yani, N, Yulistiani, M. (2017). Uji Instrument TIME Modifikasi Bates-Jensen Metode Checklist di RSUD Prof. Dr. Margono Soekarjo Purwokerto. Purwokerto : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Zubair, M., Malik, A., & Ahmad, J. (2015). Diabetic foot ulcer : A review. American Journal of Internal Medicine, 3(2), 28–49. http://doi.org/ 10.11648/j.ajim.20150302.11
Published
2020-09-04
How to Cite
Dati, S., & Yulistiani, M. (2020). Validity of Bates-Jensen Modification Wound Assessment Format. Jurnal Keperawatan, 12(4), 555-566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32583/keperawatan.v12i4.920
Section
Articles